How Architecture Works: Witold Rybczynski Discusses His 18th Book
The author walks us through the process of getting to know a building.
By Amanda Kolson Hurley, Superscript October 1, 2013If anyone stands out today as a translator between the architectural profession and the general reading public, it is the Canadian-American writer, architect, and educator Witold Rybczynski. In eighteen books and hundreds of articles, Rybczynski has elucidated the practice, context, and value of the design of buildings and cities in prose that is eloquent as well as accessible to a broad audience. In his new book, How Architecture Works: A Humanist’s Toolkit, he walks us through the process of getting to know a building. We start big, with the ideas and the setting, and progressively zero in on the structure and the details before considering the touchy matter of taste.
Rybczynski talked with Amanda Kolson Hurley about the ideas in the book, including eclecticism, what a balustrade can tell you, and why he thinks a great building is “a rare miracle.”














Amanda Kolson Hurley: In the subtitle of the book, you specify that this is “A Humanist’s Toolkit.” How do you define humanism, and why did you want to write an architectural primer from a humanist perspective?
Witold Rybczynski: I recently read a tweet that quoted Jacques Herzog: “No theory of architecture will survive—the only thing about architecture that survives is architecture.” I agree with that. For me the actual experience of a building is at the center of things. This has several ramifications: it privileges built work over theoretical projects; it doesn’t separate the practical from the aesthetic; it also accepts that buildings are experienced in bits and pieces, which makes them very different from novels, plays, and paintings.
One of my favorite books is Geoffrey Scott’s The Architecture of Humanism. Scott wrote that the enemies of humanism were chaos and inhuman order. I see an awful lot of that in today’s architecture: buildings that celebrate chaos, or thumb their nose at conventions, or create an inhuman or mechanistic atmosphere, or ignore history. This book is my response.
![]() |
How Architecture Works: A Humanist’s Toolkit by Witold Rybczynski, 2013 (Farrar, Straus and Giroux). |
AKH: Regarding chaos and nose-thumbing, some readers of the book will be surprised how sympathetically you write about Frank Gehry. People think of his architecture as willfully chaotic and iconoclastic.
WR: Gehry is a self-described humanist. I don’t find his best projects to be chaotic, although they are expressionistic. The exterior of Disney Hall responds to its surroundings, while the actual hall is axially symmetrical and calm; the skin of IAC in New York is disciplined, especially compared to Nouvel’s 100 Eleventh Avenue condos across the street; and the New World Center in Miami is a simple South Beach box—the animated forms are within. Even his house, which so upset his neighbors, has its own order, once you are inside.
AKH: You write only about buildings you have visited. Because the book is organized into
topical chapters, some appear again and again: Farnsworth House (Ideas, Structure),
the Walt Disney Concert Hall (The Setting, Plan, Details). Why did you organize the
book this way and limit yourself to 20 or so buildings?
WR: There are actually more than 150 individual buildings referred to in the book, but as you say a select number appear more than once. This is not necessarily because they are “better.” The main reason is practical, that is, I didn’t want to lumber the narrative with too many examples (during the editing process I removed many examples for that reason). It’s like having too many characters in a novel, you lose track of who’s who, and reading becomes a chore. I am not trying to be representative; this is a book about ideas, not about architects.
AKH: You champion eclecticism in style, quoting Eero Saarinen: “the style for the job.” You point out that most of us are happy with traditionalism at home, corporate minimalism at work, and expressionism at the opera house. If that's true, why do designers and critics still take sides? Is eclecticism just a convenient way of skirting debate?
WR: Is eclecticism a cop-out? I enjoy films by Wajda, Welles, and John Ford, but I also watch The Big Bang Theory and Monk; I like Bach and Randy Newman. So why shouldn’t I like different styles of architecture?
Styles have always co-existed. Thus Wren, the classicist, designed a Gothic church; Cram, the medievalist, designed a sort-of Romanesque campus for Rice. However, in the 20th century, stylistic choices became seen as moral decisions: you had to have a flat roof, or primary colors, or ribbon windows. Saarinen rejected that. He once said that the language of modern architecture went from A to B, and he wanted to add many more letters. One of the great “what-ifs” in the history of architecture is what if he hadn’t died at 51? Imagine 30 more years of work—at his pace. It might have changed the whole course of architecture.
The Book

I’m not sure why architectural criticism today is so restrictive. With the notable exception of Paul Goldberger, most critics have very narrow architectural tastes, and simply reject—or ridicule—what lies beyond. After a lifetime of teaching, writing, and designing, I’ve concluded that great architecture is a rare miracle—everything has to come together: budget, client, program, site, and of course inspiration. Consequently, it seems shortsighted to reject an excellent building on purely stylistic grounds.
AKH: Is criticism so restrictive? It's hard for critics now to be like Herbert Muschamp, unabashed champions of one style or another. I think with overtly historicist styles, though, there is the problem of pastiche, which critics are allergic to.
WR: What I meant is that most critics seem unable—or unwilling?—to judge a building on its own terms. Bob Stern and Renzo Piano must be assessed differently, but there should be room for both. Yet when Stern uses old-fashioned conventions, he is met with taunts of Disneyfication, nostalgia, or pastiche.
For me, what’s important is that an architect has a sense of conviction. Venturi and Scott Brown’s Vagelos Laboratories at Penn, where I used to work, is not one of their great buildings, and I am not a big fan of their brand of mannerism, but its design is a coherent statement. Sometime coherence is enough.
![]() |
Author Witold Rybczynski |
AKH: Isaiah Berlin divided thinkers into “hedgehogs” and “foxes,” those with one big idea versus those with a lot of ideas, and you apply this to architects. Hedgehogs like
Dominique Perrault, you suggest, are good at winning competitions because a one-idea design grabs a jury's attention. Do you think that as architectural culture becomes even more visual, foxes are at a disadvantage? Who's a modern-day fox who is under-appreciated?
WR: I do think that many architects today are one-trick ponies. I’ve always admired Aalto and
Kahn, whose buildings work at multiple levels. I recently re-visited the British Center at
Yale—what a pleasure. And what a restrained design compared to today’s museums that try so hard. Would Kahn, who relied on insightful (and patient) clients, have made his way in today’s media-obsessed profession? I doubt it.
William Rawn, whose work I admire, is a fox. His buildings, such as the new community library in Cambridge, Massachusetts, which I visited recently, incorporate many ideas. I shouldn’t say he is under-appreciated since he won the Firm of the Year award. But you really have to spend time in his buildings to understand his accomplishment—they don’t necessarily jump out at you from the printed page as so much contemporary architecture does.
AKH: For me, the most appealing chapter of the book may have been “Details,” which compares more than a dozen balustrades to reveal the small but important decisions that went into them. Why balustrades?
WR: In The Look of Architecture, I wrote that it should be possible to reconstruct an architect’s intentions from a small detail, just as an archaeologist reconstructs a pot from a few shards. Several years ago I started photographing balustrades. I reasoned that the basic requirements for a balustrade are fixed, so the design is really completely up to the architect. I suppose I could have done the same thing with door handles, or baseboards, but I chose balustrades.
You Might Also Like
Announcements
Louis Kahn: The Importance of a Drawing
Louis Kahn: The Importance of a Drawing
Edited by Michael Merrill
Publisher: Lars Müller Publishers
Published: October 2021
The first in-depth study of drawings as primary sources of insight into architect Louis Kahn’s architecture and creative imagination. Based on unprecedented archival research, with over 900 illustrations and written contributions by Michael Benedikt, Michael Cadwell, David Leatherbarrow, Louis Kahn, Nathaniel Kahn, Sue Ann Kahn, Michael J. Lewis, Robert McCarter, Michael Merrill, Marshall Meyers, Jane Murphy, Gina Pollara, Harriet Pattison, Colin Rowe, David Van Zanten, Richard Wesley, and William Whitaker.
Why Design Matters: Conversations with the World’s Most Creative People by Debbie Millman
Why Design Matters: Conversations with the World's Most Creative People
By Debbie Millman
Publisher: Harper Design
Published: February 22, 2022
Debbie Millman—author, educator, brand consultant, and host of the widely successful and award-winning podcast “Design Matters”—showcases dozens of her most exciting interviews, bringing together insights and reflections from today’s leading creative minds from across diverse fields.
Design Emergency: Building a Better Future by Alice Rawsthorn and Paola Antonelli
Design Emergency: Building a Better Future
By Alice Rawsthorn and Paola Antonelli
Publisher: Phaidon Press
Published: May 25, 2022
Rawsthorn and Antonelli tell the stories of the remarkable designers, architects, engineers, artists, scientists, and activists who are at the forefront of positive change worldwide. Focusing on four themes—Technology, Society, Communication, and Ecology—the authors present a unique portrait of how our great creative minds are developing new design solutions to the major challenges of our time, while helping us to benefit from advances in science and technology.
Our Days Are Like Full Years: A Memoir with Letters from Louis Kahn by Harriet Pattison
Our Days Are Like Full Years: A Memoir with Letters from Louis Kahn
By Harriet Pattison
Publisher: Yale University Press
Published: October 2020
An intimate glimpse into the professional and romantic relationship between Harriet Pattison and the renowned architect Louis Kahn. Harriet Pattison, FASLA, is a distinguished landscape architect. She was Louis Kahn’s romantic partner from 1959 to 1974, and his collaborator on the landscapes of the Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, and the F.D.R. Memorial/Four Freedoms Park, New York. She is the mother of their son, Oscar-nominated filmmaker Nathaniel Kahn.
Meet Me by the Fountain: An Inside History of the Mall by Alexandra Lange
Meet Me by the Fountain: An Inside History of the Mall
By Alexandra Lange
Publisher: Bloomsbury
Published: June 2022
Chronicles postwar architects’ and merchants’ invention of the shopping mall, revealing how the design of these marketplaces played an integral role in their cultural ascent. Publishers Weekly writes, “Contending that malls answer ‘the basic human need’ of bringing people together, influential design critic Lange advocates for retrofitting abandoned shopping centers into college campuses, senior housing, and ‘ethnocentric marketplaces’ catering to immigrant communities. Lucid and well researched, this is an insightful study of an overlooked and undervalued architectural form.”
David King: Designer, Activist, Visual Historian by Rick Poynor
David King: Designer, Activist, Visual Historian
By Rick Poynor
Publisher: Yale University Press
Published: September 2020
A comprehensive overview of the work and legacy of David King (1943–2016), whose fascinating career bridged journalism, graphic design, photography, and collecting. King launched his career at Britain’s Sunday Times Magazine in the 1960s, starting as a designer and later branching out into image-led journalism, blending political activism with his design work.
Popular NowWeekMonth
- The Creative Interviewer: Debbie Millman on Why Design Matters
- Le Corbusier: A Legacy in Books
- Eugene Feldman, Co-Editor, and Co-Designer of The Notebooks and Drawings of Louis I. Kahn
- The Illustrated Book in Italy, 1918–1945
- Louis Kahn: A Memoir
Recent Articles


